Collaborative Divorce Texas

  • Donate
  • For Professionals
    • Membership Advantages
    • Events/Training
    • Become a Member
    • For Students
    • Volunteer at CDT
    • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Home
  • Find a Collaborative Professional
  • What is a Collaborative Divorce?
    • What is Collaborative Divorce?
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • About CDTexas
    • Master and Credentialed Collaborative Divorce Professionals
    • The Gay G. Cox Award for Excellence in Collaborative Law
  • Blog
  • For Collaborative Professionals
    • Membership Benefits
    • Events/Training
    • Become a Member
    • For Students
    • Advertise With Us
    • Volunteer at CDT
    • Login
  • Donate
  • Contact Us
  • What is Collaborative Divorce?
    • What is Collaborative Divorce?
    • Why Use a CDTexas Member?
    • About Us
    • Master and Credentialed Collaborative Divorce Professionals
    • The Gay G. Cox Award for Excellence in Collaborative Law
  • Testimonials
  • FAQs
  • Blog
  • Find A Professional
    • How Do I Choose a Collaborative Professional?
    • Attorneys
    • Financial Professionals
    • Mental Health Professionals
    • See All

Donate

You are here: Home / Blog / Influence and Persuasion

Influence and Persuasion

October 4, 2016 By Harry Munsinger, J.D., Ph.D.

Psychologists believe there are two basic ways people are influenced: one is through reason and the other is based on intuition and emotion.  The cognitive approach relies on well-reasoned arguments, a conscious weighing of pros and cons, consideration of multiple options, reviewing factual evidence, and valuation of options in relation to the client’s goals and interests.  Cognitive persuasion is hard work and takes time.  By contrast, the intuitive approach is automatic and almost effortless.  Emotions and intuitions rely on superficial cues rather than facts or arguments.  Intuitive decisions are often made on the basis of perceived expertness or attractiveness of the presenter rather than the soundness of her logic.

Cognitive influence is generally more stable and enduring while intuitive influence can be ephemeral and fleeting.  Some clients are more easily persuaded by cognitive arguments while others are more often influenced by emotion.  Cognitive persuasion relies on clear, logical arguments while intuitive influence is based on distraction, confusion, fatigue, ambiguity and emotion.

Emotions also influence the type of persuasion that’s most effective for an individual.  For example, happiness or anger generally triggers intuitive processing, while sadness triggers thinking.  The source and content of a message also determine its persuasiveness.  A credible source who provides accurate and useful information will appear knowledgeable and more persuasive than someone who provides contradictory information and appears self-interested.  A neutral expert can be especially influential at critical moments in the settlement process.  Easy to understand arguments are more appealing to listeners than complicated chains of reasoning which tend to confuse rather than educate.

Confidently expressed arguments are generally more persuasive than tentative suggestions, even though there is no relationship between the confidence of a speaker and the accuracy of her statements.  Several strong logical arguments presented by different people are generally more persuasive that the same arguments presented by one person.  On the other hand, if the arguments are weak, they are more likely to be believed if delivered by a single individual.

Arguments are more persuasive if the expert presents both the strengths and weaknesses of her position.  An expert will increase her credibility if she honestly points out flaws in her arguments.  However, presenting additional weak arguments won’t persuade the other side.  Instead, the expert’s judgment will appear poor if she presents weak arguments because the listener will wonder why the expert is presenting such flimsy facts and arguments.  Logical arguments win the day, not simply the number of statements an expert makes.  Additionally, it’s important to rebut an opponent’s arguments rather than simply ignoring them.

Finally, research shows that arguments presented early in a proceeding are more influential than later statements.  Also, the last argument you hear is recalled better than earlier material.  Thus, present your best arguments at the beginning and repeat them again at the end of your presentation to make them maximally persuasive and better recalled.

About Harry Munsinger, J.D., Ph.D.

Harry Munsinger practices collaborative and estate law in San Antonio. He has over twenty years experience resolving disputes involving divorce, probate, wills, and trusts. Harry was an adjunct law professor at the University of Texas and St. Mary’s University. He has published several textbooks and over forty psychological and legal articles. Harry has been a forensic psychology expert, a licensed psychologist and a litigator.

Filed Under: Blog, Harry Munsinger

Find a Professional

Getting started with the Collaborative Process?

First your need to connect with a trained Collaborative Professional.

[Find Out More....]

Articles by Category

Featured Video

  • Collaborative Divorce Testimonial
  • Child of Divorce

Why Collaborative?

  • Jennifer Leister
  • Steve Walker
  • Carla Calabrese
  • Dawn Budner
  • Becky Davenport
  • Jody Johnson
  • Honey Schef
  • James Urmin
  • Kurt Chacon
  • Natalie Gregg
  • Robert Matlock
  • Deborah Lyons
  • Carlos Salinas
  • Camille Scroggins
  • Linda Solomon
  • Richard Soat
  • Lisa Rothfus
  • Jeffrey Shore
  • Barbara Cole
  • David Brunson
  • Jennifer Tull
  • Syd Sh
  • Susan Z. Wright
  • Christi Trusler
  • Camille Milnser
  • Linda Threats
  • Sarah Keathley
  • MaryAnn Kildebeck
  • David Bouschor
  • LIsa Marquis
  • Harry Munsinger
  • Vicki James
  • Robin Watts
  • Katie Berry
  • Jack Emmott
  • Jennifer Broussard
  • Patricia Havard
  • Paula Locke Smyth
  • Laura Schlenker
  • Norma Trusch
  • Brett Christiansen
  • Tim Whitten
  • Mickey Gayler
  • Melinsa Eitzen
  • Julian Schwartz
  • MaryAnn Knolle
  • Chad Olsen
  • Chris Farish
  • Charles Quaid
  • Anne Shuttee
  • Barbara Runge
  • Rhonda Cleaves -
  • Jamie Patterson
  • Catherine Baron
  • Kristen Algert
  • Sandra Roland
  • Rhonda Cleaves 2
  • Gratia Schoemakers

Have you read?

Coping with Divorce

Communicate, compromise and connect through the collaborative divorce process. Your spouse steps into your room and says: “We need to talk.” Immediately, your stress level jumps and you feel … [Read More...]

More Articles from this Category

The Collaborative Law Institute of Texas

d/b/a
Collaborative Divorce Texas

Proud Members of IACP

1400 Preston Road
Suite 400
Plano, TX 75093
(972) 386-0158

Please note: Our office will be closed on

Holiday closures:
Limited: Nov. 23rd & 24th
Closed: Nov. 25th , 26th and 27th

Christmas:
Closed from December 24-December 30, 2022.
Offices open on January 2nd, 2023.


Website Terms of Usage

Contact Our Webmaster

 

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Search Our Website

Find A Professional

  • Find a Collaborative Professional
  • Attorneys
  • Financial Professionals
  • Mental Health Professionals
  • See All
EnglishFrançaisDeutschItalianoPortuguêsEspañol

Copyright © 2023 · Collaborative Divorce Texas · All Rights Reserved

· · ·

Web Design and Maintenance by The Crouch Group